Why Italy? Why Leonardo? Why Michelangelo? Yes, these are simple questions, but they’re the best ones to present to novelist and historical biographer Ross King, whose latest book is “Leonardo and ‘The Last Supper’ “ (Walker & Company).
I borrowed a page (and some inspiration) from another book blog, The Arched Doorway — and a nice interview of Karen Dales — and decided to ask Ross to discuss the motivations behind his writing (he’s far too polite to ever refuse; note his friendly expression to the left).
Our discussion also moved in the direction of thriller writer Dan Brown, but this conversation took place well before the announcement this week that Brown’s forthcoming new Robert Langdon novel is situated in Italy, a country that Ross continually revisits in his nonfiction work.
You’ve written about Michelangelo, Brunelleschi, Machiavelli, now Leonardo — Where does your fascination with the Italian past come from?
Ross King: I’m interested in those moments in history when there’s a very definite shift — a revolution even — in the way people design, paint and think. Fifteenth-century Florence was probably the best example we have of these intellectual and artistic tipping points.
I’m interested in how it was that a city of only 30,000 people managed to produce, in the space of a century, geniuses such as Brunelleschi, Donatello, Lorenzo Ghiberti, Leonardo, Michelangelo and Machiavelli. I’m still looking for the answers!
Your earlier books included novels, but your most recent books are works of nonfiction — do you consider nonfiction to be your home, now, or would you consider a return to fiction if the right subject presented itself?
RK: I would definitely love to do another novel. Unbelievable as it seems to me, it’s been fifteen years since I wrote my last novel, “Ex-Libris.” I do have a few ideas, so it’s a matter of finding the time to develop them. I’ve learned a lot about writing in the last fifteen years, so I’m hopeful that I could do a reasonably good job!
How do you feel about books like “The Da Vinci Code” which suggest hidden conspiracies and messages in Leonardo’s work?
RK: I don’t agree with many of the popular interpretations of Leonardo’s work. They say more about our own obsessions than those of Leonardo and his contemporaries. But on the other hand I don’t object to anything that makes people look more closely at works of art, or anything that brings artists to public consciousness. Funnily enough, “The Da Vinci Code” was in part responsible for my book on Leonardo.
It was? So Dan Brown deserves some credit for leading you to the subject of your newest book?
RK: Yes, in a way he does. Back in the heyday of Dan Brown, I used to get asked to give lectures on the “real” Leonardo and the truth, or otherwise, of “The Da Vinci Code.” The novel forced me to look very closely at the paintings and also to study the documentary evidence and historical record. It was while doing my research for these lectures that I realized how the full story of how Leonardo painted “The Last Supper” would be a fascinating subject for a book. So I suppose I ultimately do have Dan Brown to thank for that!
Your new book sheds so much light on the creation of a world masterpiece, and I wonder if thriller writers like Brown have actually helped you in another way: to reach an even wider audience. I’d bet that more people know about Leonardo now, thanks to Brown, and that must be helpful to writers with a more scholarly, serious interest. What do you think?
RK: Yes, it may well be that “The Da Vinci Code” has helped writers tackling the historical Leonardo – such as Charles Nicholl or myself – reach a wider audience. So for that, too, I can make no complaint.
- A frustrated failure and his masterpiece: new in bookstores (nickowchar.wordpress.com)
- Leonardo Da Vinci – The Risk Taker (dfolstad58.wordpress.com)
- Leonardo and The Last Supper, a portrait of the times behind Da Vinci (mcclatchydc.com)
- The ‘D’ in ‘Dan Brown’ Stands for ‘Dante’ (nickowchar.wordpress.com)